policystamp.com
Home / Free audit / Terms of Service Analyzer

Terms of Service Analyzer

An AI-powered analysis of your terms against the contract and consumer law that applies.

Analyze my terms Free · No signup · ~20 seconds
  • Section-by-section breakdown, not just an overall score
  • Each gap mapped to the specific clause it violates
  • Severity classified so you know what to fix first

Terms of service are a structured document with predictable required sections. Compliance is mostly about disclosure completeness and clause enforceability — does the document say what it has to say, and would the clauses actually hold up in the jurisdictions you serve? An AI analyzer is well suited to this because it can read the document, compare it against the disclosure and enforceability checklists, and surface gaps faster and more consistently than a human reviewer can. Our analyzer is calibrated against the actual statutory text plus official guidance (FTC enforcement actions, EU CRD recitals, UK CMA guidance).

What we check

Grounded in real law, not training-data recall.

AI grounded in real law

The analyzer is given the actual statutory text — UCC §§2-313 to 2-316, California ARL, EU CRD 2011/83/EU, UK CRA 2015, AU Consumer Law §§54-62. It is not relying on training-data recall — the law is in the prompt.

Verify-before-flag rule

The analyzer searches the entire document for each topic before reporting it as missing. Loose paraphrases count. Same-meaning language under a different heading counts. We refuse to flag "X is missing" when X is present.

Post-process filter

After the AI returns its findings, a server-side filter drops known over-flagged patterns that production terms routinely omit without regulator action.

Per-issue evidence

Every critical or major finding includes a quote from your document, or an explicit statement that we searched for the topic and found no mention. No vague "could be improved" findings.

Common findings

What you'll probably see in the report.

  • "AS IS" disclaimer without statutory carve-outs

    Most common critical for B2C terms with EU/UK/AU customers. The "AS IS" line needs a statutory-rights preservation sentence.

  • Auto-renewal in body text, not near the price

    California ARL requires the disclosure be clear and conspicuous near the price. Mid-document mentions get flagged.

  • Modification clause without notice

    "We may change these terms at any time" is unenforceable for material changes. Needs reasonable notice + termination right.

Ready to find the gaps in your terms?

Paste a URL or your terms text. Get a structured gap report plus a 0–100 compliance score in around 20 seconds. Free, no signup, no email.

FAQ

Questions people ask before running the audit.

Run your audit now.

Free, structured, calibrated for SMBs. Paste your URL or text and get the report in seconds.