policystamp.com
Home / Free audit / Is My Terms of Service Enforceable?

Is My Terms of Service Enforceable?

Paste your terms. We check clause-by-clause enforceability against the jurisdictions you serve.

Check enforceability Free · No signup · ~20 seconds
  • Clause-by-clause enforceability per jurisdiction
  • Surfaces the standard "tough" clauses that quietly do not work
  • Plain-English fix for each weak clause

A tough-looking terms-of-service clause is worth nothing if a court will not enforce it. "Binding arbitration with class-action waiver" is generally enforceable in the US but unenforceable for B2C in the EU and UK. "No refunds under any circumstances" is overridden by the EU 14-day withdrawal right and AU Consumer Law statutory guarantees. "We may change these terms at any time without notice" is widely unenforceable for material changes. Our checker walks your terms clause-by-clause and tells you which ones would actually hold up where your customers live.

What we check

Grounded in real law, not training-data recall.

Limitation of liability

Whether the cap is reasonable, whether carve-outs are present (confidentiality, indemnification, IP, gross negligence), and whether statutory consumer rights are preserved for EU/UK/AU.

Warranty disclaimers

"AS IS" is fine for B2B in the US. For B2C in EU/UK/AU it must preserve statutory consumer guarantees — implied terms of satisfactory quality, fitness for purpose.

Arbitration + class-action waiver

Enforceable in US generally (Concepcion), unenforceable for B2C in EU/UK. State carve-outs apply (California §1281.2, NJ, MA) for US consumer arbitration.

Refund / no-refund clauses

"No refunds under any circumstances" overridden by EU CRD 14-day withdrawal right, UK CCR 2013, and AU Consumer Law major-failure remedies.

Modification mechanism

"We may change at any time without notice" unenforceable for material changes. Needs reasonable notice + termination right.

Content-licence overreach

Content licenses that include training-data reuse or commercial repurposing beyond hosting the service are increasingly being struck down or attracting regulator attention.

Common findings

What you'll probably see in the report.

  • Tough clause that quietly does not work

    Most B2C terms have at least one "tough" clause (no refunds, binding arbitration, unilateral modification) that is unenforceable in at least one jurisdiction the business serves.

  • Wrong governing-law strategy

    A US-based company with EU customers cannot use a "governed by Delaware law" clause to escape EU consumer-protection rules. Common misconception.

  • Over-broad indemnification

    Indemnification requiring the customer to defend the provider against "any and all" claims is over-broad and often narrowed by courts to "reasonable" claims arising from customer breach.

Ready to find the gaps in your terms?

Paste a URL or your terms text. Get a structured gap report plus a 0–100 compliance score in around 20 seconds. Free, no signup, no email.

FAQ

Questions people ask before running the audit.

Run your audit now.

Free, structured, calibrated for SMBs. Paste your URL or text and get the report in seconds.