Disclaimer Checker
Paste a URL or your disclaimer text. See what is missing in 20 seconds.
- Content-type-aware: health, financial, legal, affiliate, results
- Catches missing FTC affiliate disclosures
- Each finding cites the specific FTC / FDA / SEC rule
Disclaimers carry real liability when they are missing the right language and add zero value when they are full of boilerplate that does not address the actual content type. A health-blog disclaimer needs FDA structure-function language. A finance newsletter needs SEC-style not-investment-advice language. An affiliate site needs FTC 16 CFR Part 255 material-connection disclosures. Our checker reads your disclaimer, identifies what kind of content it is meant to cover, and shows you what is missing for that content type. Catches the most common gaps: missing affiliate disclosure, missing "not professional advice" language, overbroad waivers that courts will not enforce.
Grounded in real law, not training-data recall.
"Not professional advice" language
Explicit statement that content is informational, not [legal / medical / financial / professional] advice. Per content type.
No professional-relationship clause
Statement that viewing or reading does not create a [doctor-patient / attorney-client / fiduciary] relationship.
FTC affiliate / material-connection disclosure
For affiliate or sponsored content: required by FTC 16 CFR Part 255. Must be clear and conspicuous, placed before or near the link, not footer-only.
FDA structure-function (for health / supplement content)
"These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." Required by 21 USC §343(r)(6).
Results / earnings disclaimer (for testimonials)
"Results are not typical; individual results will vary." Required by FTC Endorsement Guides when testimonials are featured.
Overbroad waiver flag
"By using this site you waive all rights to sue" is unenforceable in most consumer contexts and signals the disclaimer was drafted without legal review.
What you'll probably see in the report.
Affiliate site, no clear FTC disclosure
Most common critical for content-site disclaimers. Footer-only disclosure does not meet FTC "clear and conspicuous" standard.
Health blog, no FDA language
Common for wellness sites that discuss supplements or symptoms. Triggers FDA warning letters when claims edge into structure-function territory.
Financial newsletter, no SEC-style limit
Newsletters discussing specific securities without "not investment advice" + "not a registered investment adviser" disclosures attract SEC attention.
Overbroad "waive all rights to sue"
Common and unenforceable. Courts narrow these to defensible language and the rest of the disclaimer is weakened by visible overreach.
Ready to find the gaps in your disclaimer?
Paste a URL or your disclaimer text. Get a structured gap report plus a 0–100 compliance score in around 20 seconds. Free, no signup, no email.
Questions people ask before running the audit.
Other ways people audit their policies.
Run your audit now.
Free, structured, calibrated for SMBs. Paste your URL or text and get the report in seconds.